So, my intellectual energies have been mostly devoted to the Active Citizenship Toolkit, which is a project of the group I am part of – Climate Emergency Manchester. I’ve researched and written a couple of novice’s guides – to Manchester City Council’s budget process, and to the thorny question of allyship. Other two page guides are ‘under review’ and will go up soon.
ALSO, and this is Good News – I have been shortlisted for an academic job. It’s about social innovation. So, over the coming few days expect a bunch of posts about that subject, and “acceleration” and so on. This is to help me figure out what I think and what I should say (and of course NOT say on the day itself…) Here’s a link to a list of ‘adjectival innovations’ and innovation terminology I made a while back. Doubtless will have to expand it…
So, below, a few preliminary comments about my prejudices, and then I will follow up with another, more “ACT” related post about the thorny question of “capacity building”…
First banality: The word “innovation” is sprinkled around like magic pixie dust. Like its cousins reform and progress it sidesteps/silences profound questions about morality and end-states. Most of the time it is used there is a (knowing?) naivete around questions of incumbent power and resistance.
Second banality: Most work on “innovation” and “efficiency” also largely ignore rebound effects – what will be done with the money/time/energy ‘saved’? So, you insulate someone’s house so they aren’t being bled white on fuel bills. This is a good thing. But from a “carbon saved” perspective, what if they then use the money they saved to fly to Barcelona or Prague for the weekend.
Third banality: Most innovations fail, or take a hell of a lot longer to mature than folks think they will (people and hype-cycles, eh?)
Look, we’re in the shit. We have had over 30 years to take action on climate change, and in all that time we have just dug our holes deeper. More people on the planet, yes, but crucially, far more fossil fuel infrastructure, far higher expectations of an always on world etc etc etc (and yes, this is not individual consumers’ “fault” blah blah systemic blah blah regimes).
And because we are in the shit, we are busy bright-siding ourselves. You saw it after the Paris Agreement, when people who really ought to have known better (and probably, in private, DID know better) spouted all sorts of guff about turning points [here’s a blog I wrote about that in December 2015]. And now here we all are in coronaworld, spouting guff about Green Recoveries, with no sense of the coalitions-work needed to make that happen.
So we latch onto the idea of social innovation “(versus” technological innovation? I don’t know, I haven’t read the literature. Hopefully nobody is that ill-informed?)
And we Need To Believe that it will get us to where we need to get to. Social Tipping Innovations etc. Yes, we all apparently need to contract an STI…
It reminds me of that clip from “The Newsroom” where they get a climate scientist on and he says “x/yz/ would all have been great 20 or even 10 years ago…”
So, sophomoric ill-informed doomster rant over. I am going to dive into various academic articles about social innovation, energy transitions, urban governance. . Going to blog about each (usually in a batch).
Criteria for articles on a kind of Likert scale on Should you read this ?
Defo not (unlikely to publish a review)
And also “What else by authors is any good?”
Social innovations like technological innovations, are all well and good, and fun to study at the Research and Development stage. But deployment and dissemination/diffusion whatever, that is usually a far trickier thing.
Individuals who are part of innovation get tired, burnout, demoralised, or sell out (literally)
Meanwhile, organisations are fantastically bad at sustaining morale. On the whole they either flame out or become self-sustaining rigid bureaucracies, trading on past glories.
That doesn’t, it seem to me on a rough first glance, get captured in academic work about social innovation, because who goes back after five years, or ten years, or fifteen years and sees “where are they now?” It is just endless polaroids, some explicit, some not, all always fading.
This is a marathon, not a sprint, So, need to think of it as a relay race to – how does “the baton” get handed on? We (activists) need to think of sharing the load. Which is the subject of the next blog post – on “capacity building”.
Leave a Reply