Policy Subsystems

A policy subsystem is defined by a substantive issue and geographic scope and composed of a set of stakeholders including officials from all levels of government, representatives from multiple interest groups, and scientists/researchers (Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith, 1999). (Weible, 2005:461)


Second, the principal unit of analysis for studying policy processes is the policy subsystem. Policy subsystems are defined by a topical area, a geographic territory, and the policy actors involved. Policy subsystems can occur at any level of government from local to national and can occur cross-nationally. Policy subsystems are also nested and overlapping and semi-autonomous. They may involve officials from any level of government and non-government policy actors including those from the private sector, non-profits, academia, consulting firms, the news media, engaged citizens, and possibly others.
(Cairney and Weible, 2015:93)

Weible, C. 2005. Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 58,  (3), pp. 461-475.

Cairney, P.  and Weible, C. 2015. Comparing and Contrasting Peter Hall’s Paradigms and Ideas with the Advocacy Coalition Framework. In Hogan J. and Howlett, M. (eds)  Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 83-99.


Within the Advocacy Coalition Framework, that which contains the clash of advocacy coalitions, mediated (maybe) by a policy broker, leading to decisions, policy outputs and policy impacts, which feed in to external system events.

Meanwhile, the carbon dioxide accumulates…


See also mature policy subsystems

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: