Better get the full disclosure in here - Prof Newell was external examiner on my PhD, and also a referee for the job I am about to start. So if this were totally pants, I would be unlikely to say so. This is not totally pants. It's not even a little bit pants (but MRDA,... Continue Reading →
‘Treasury Control’ and the British Environmental State: The Political Economy of Green Development Strategy in UK Central Government
This was damned good Craig, M. 2020. ‘Treasury Control’ and the British Environmental State: The Political Economy of Green Development Strategy in UK Central Government New Political Economy. 25 (1) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13563467.2018.1526269 As the epigram wants you to understand, this is not new. “Treasury control is something that you live under, that you suffer from, that you profit by; and... Continue Reading →
What elite actors learn from issue attention cycles #SocialMovementFailure #climate
I am brewing a piece (rant) on the last 3 years, from the end of 2018 to now. The gist is that the trajectory of the "climate movement" was entirely predictable in the round. Yes, specific idiocies like the XR tube action, and getting hit by a pandemic were not in anyone's particular scenario, but... Continue Reading →
“Designing industrial strategy for a low carbon transformation”
Busch, J, Foxon, T. and Taylor, P. 2018. Designing industrial strategy for a low carbon transformation, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 29 (2018) 114–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.005 Much meaty goodness in this comprehensive overview of green industrial policy and the literature around it... The authors "draw on and combine insights from neo-Schumpeterian (evolutionary) and ecological economics perspectives to... Continue Reading →
“The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: Insights from diversifying petroleum technology suppliers in Norway”
Another absolutely brilliant article, with serious conceptual chops. A thickening/broadening of TIS, forcing you to think more "within" a sector, seeing the different ways a mature/declining sector might go (or rather, actors within it might go - a real Theseus' ship situation there...) Andersen, A. and Gulbrandsen, M. 2020. The innovation and industry dynamics of... Continue Reading →
“Incumbent actors as niche agents”
Späth, P., Rohracher, H., and von Radecki, A., 2016. Incumbent actors as niche agents: the German car industry and the taming of the “Stuttgart E-mobility region”. Sustainability, 8 (3), 252. doi:10.3390/su8030252 I read this for more on the "how incumbents behave" question, and it didn't disappoint. As folks (including in articles I've read this month)... Continue Reading →
“Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries” – article 5 of 10…
So, here's another - am now halfway through my reading goal, with 10 days left to read 5 more papers... Max Åhman, Lars J. Nilsson & Bengt Johansson (2017) Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries, Climate Policy, 17:5, 634-649, As they say "The aim of this study is to analyse how the global climate... Continue Reading →
4 dimensional chess: “Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics”
Yikes. I just ain't ever gonna be this smart. I mean, I can see how it's done, like watching Roger Federer play tennis. You can understand the commentators explaining. But to actually DO it? Yeah, good luck with that. Oh well. Fortunately though, to collect a pay check, I am not going to have to... Continue Reading →
Keeping the balls in the air, literally
For the last three months I have been teaching myself to juggle. Extremely soothing, when you are "in the flow." I would not have got anywhere without the great "Taylor tries" videos, which, if you want to learn to juggle, you should definitely check out. I've got a bunch of the three ball basics -... Continue Reading →
Nicely done- “The continuing failure of UK climate change mitigation policy” (article 3 of 10)
So, full disclosure, I know the author of this piece, and mostly get on with him (we disagree over the likely effectiveness of Extinction Rebellion, but so what). The piece is good. It "focuses on the UK government’s policies on mitigation. It evaluates the shifts in approach to climate change since 1992, lists the various... Continue Reading →